(775) 227-6555 | dave.adams@bizfg.com
1: Managers work in isolation from other team members.
New team members learn on their own by trial and error.
No apprenticeship culture exists and everyone fends for themselves.
5: Every manager is actively coaching teammates on execution.
New teammates are systematically apprenticed by managers.
A strong apprenticeship culture exists in the business.
1: An Operations and Training manual is non-existent or out of date.
Team members do not consult written documentation on how to operate.
5: The Operations and Training manual is current and revised quarterly.
Team members regularly refer to the manual for how to operate.
1: Leaders and Staff operate on a reactive, fire-fighting basis each day.
Urgent tasks come first. High importance items are fit when possible.
5: Leaders and Staff operates according to a default calendar.
Activities are prioritized based on importance first. Urgent items second.
1: Stakeholders have no objective, market-based valuation of the business.
Managers are not measuring and managing based on shareholder value.
Business is not being promoted to qualified industry buyers.
5: Stakeholders are monitoring the value of the business quarterly.
Managers are accountable for increasing shareholder value.
Offers from qualified industry buyers are being evaluated.
1: No one is proactively managing multiple recruitment strategies.
The flow of qualified candidates applying for open positions is sporadic.
The candidates generated are usually under qualified.
5: A manager is constantly improving at least 10 recruiting strategies.
The recruiting pipeline always has more then enough qualified candidates.
Psychometric Placement Process
1: Candidates not screened using psychometrics and skills-based tests.
Post-hire performance data is not measured or monitored.
The effectiveness of the hiring model and the mis-hire rate is very high.
5: All candidates are screened using psychometrics and skills-based tests.
Non-performers are screened out before they join the team.
Post-hire data is collected and used to refine the hiring model.
1: No key performance indicators beyond basic financial statements.
No other metrics are being measured, reported, or managed regularly.
Team has only a sense for how their performance impacts the business.
5: 5 to 10 key numbers indicating the overall performance of the business.
Systematically measure and report those on a daily or weekly basis.
Everyone knows the numbers measuring their individual performance.
1: Team members have no commitment to eliminating waste.
Time, movement, and materials are not tracked effectively.
Efficiency is not measured, managed, or rewarded.
5: All team members rally around a commitment to eliminate waste.
Time, movement, and materials are tracked to continually improve.
Efficiency, lowering costs, and effectiveness are rewarded.
1: Employees leave their passion and creativity at home each day.
They contribute the minimum required effort to keep their jobs.
Staff expect base & benefits with nothing at-risk and no incentive to care.
5: Every teammate has incentives that motivate hard work and pride.
Base and at-risk pay are blended to incentivize commitment and creativity.
Team members care about the business as if it was their own.
1: No written strategic plan has not been developed.
Values, vision, mission, and objectives are poorly defined and shifting.
Strategic direction and decisions are made without team input.
5: A written strategic plan clarifies the team values, vision, and mission.
Updates to annual and quarterly financial targets are monitored weekly.
Strategic objectives are updated at least quarterly with input from all.
1: No plan exists to identify and intentionally develop emerging leaders.
Long-term commitment is disincentivized by a turf-protecting culture.
There is win-lose approach to compensation.
5: Emerging leaders are intentionally identified and developed with a plan.
All key stakeholders are incentivized for long-term commitment.
A profit-sharing plan and a plan for leadership succession are defined.
1: There is no rhythm of regularly scheduled team meetings.
Shareholder and manager communication is inconsistent and inefficient.
Off-site planning is rare and decisions are communicated haphazardly.
5: Daily, weekly, quarterly and yearly rhythm meetings are well established.
Those meetings drive goal-setting, reporting, and accountability.
Decisions cascade through the organization quickly and efficiently.
1: Little thought is given to the system of work flow in the organization.
Spotty job descriptions and org charts create confusion and waste.
Authority not clearly defined or delegated, work moves inefficiently.
5: Managers carefully monitor the system of work flow in the organization.
Org charts and job descriptions are regularly updated to prevent waste.
Everyone knows their role and authority, work moves smoothly.
1: Individual strengths get little attention when assigning roles.
Team is plagued by lack of trust, unhealthy conflict, and low commitment.
Poor execution yields unacceptable business results.
5: Using a reliable system for placing teammates in roles.
Strengths and and skills are evaluated and nurtured.
Team is cohesive, powerful, committed and delivers business results.
1: Managers have no business plan to forecast cash-flow and profit.
Working capital needs and the ability to pay debt are not calculated.
Planning is done only in reaction to immediate business needs.
5: Managers monitor and update the business plan quarterly.
Cash-flow, working capital needs and debt carrying ability are forecasted.
Shareholders and investors understand the profit and return picture.
1: Fixed costs have bloated and sales have declined or not met plan.
Revenue is below break-even, essential costs are not being covered.
Debt is increasing continuously.
5: Managers implement plans to right-size costs and stop any bleeding.
Sales are driven to quickly spike above break-even when needed.
Owner drawings and fixed costs are covered, and debt is being repaid.
1: Receivables are growing unchecked, vendors have tightened their terms.
Price pressures and inefficiencies have cut gross margins.
Cash flow and debt problems and investments mean being postponed.
5: Collections and vendor terms are carefully monitored and improved.
Prices are increased aggressively within market limitations.
Cash is being used to invest in growth and repay high interest debt.
1: No compact, lively Unique Selling Proposition and Guarantee.
Price is the main differentiation, no clear & significant value proposition.
An unclear and confusing message is communicated by the team.
5: Unique Selling Proposition and Guarantee are persuasively articulated.
Target clients are compelled to pay a higher price vs competitors.
The team aggressively communicates the message to the target market.
1: Sales team has no formal, tested and measured sales process.
Selling activity is not coordinated or managed on a regular basis.
There is a large gap between high and low performers.
Sales compensation is structured with salaries with little results impact.
5: Sales force has a well tested, carefully scripted sales process.
Their activity is coordinated with an appropriate software solution.
Conversion rates and results are measured and reported weekly.
Sales force compensation is based on actual sales results.
1: No marketing plan produces a predictable number of leads; or tracks
conversion rates, revenue per transaction, and transactions per customer.
The results of spending on marketing and advertising is unmeasured.
Managers are doing virtually nothing to proactively drive revenue growth.
5: Managers have developed an aggressive, measurable marketing plan.
Predictable numbers of leads are produced, driving profits with improved
Marketing plan results are measured and improved on a weekly basis.
Revenue & Profit Budget
1: No month by month budgeting to forecast revenue and expenses.
Not clear if desired earnings and owner drawings can be delivered.
Financial decisions are made from bank balances and sales estimates.
5: Monthly budgets forecast the revenue required to deliver returns.
Return is measured as desired EBITDA net of owner drawings.
Key decisions are made using weekly reports of budget versus actual.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions